In re A.J. CA5
This matter involves a minor who comes before this court for the third time in four years. In 2018, we affirmed the juvenile court after it found true that appellant had committed (1) residential burglary (Pen. Code, § 459); (2) robbery (§ 211); (3) assault with a deadly weapon (§ 245, subd. (a)(1)); and (4) battery with infliction of serious bodily injury (§ 243, subd. (d)). (In re A.J. (Dec. 14, 2018, F075246) [nonpub. opn.].)
While that first appeal was pending, appellant incurred various violations of probation. In November 2018, appellant was again deemed a ward of the juvenile court and his physical custody was removed from his parent or guardian. A maximum term of confinement of nine years four months was set.
In 2020, we concluded in an unpublished opinion that the maximum term of confinement had been erroneously calculated because some of the sentences imposed should have been stayed under section 654.
Comments on In re A.J. CA5