legal news


Register | Forgot Password

In re J.G. CA4/1
Jorge G. (Father) appeals an order in the Welfare and Institutions Code section 300 dependency proceeding for J.G., granting sole legal and physical custody of J.G. to M.R. (Mother). Specifically, Father challenges the juvenile court’s denial of his request to be elevated to presumed parent status pursuant to Family Code section 7611, subdivision (d). Father also contends he was prejudiced because the court did not rule on his presumed status until after the six-month family maintenance review hearing, following J.G.’s placement with Mother at the disposition hearing. Based on our review of the record, we conclude there is substantial evidence to support the court’s finding that Father had not fully developed a parental relationship with J.G. and therefore did not qualify for presumed status. Father was not prejudiced by the timing of such finding because an earlier ruling denying Father presumed status would not have changed the outcome of the custody orders.

Search thread for
Download thread as



Quick Reply

Your Name:
Your Comment:

smiling face wink grin cool nod sticking out tongue raised eyebrow confused shocked shaking head disapproval rolling eyes sad mad

Click an emoji to insert it into your message. You may use BB Codes in your message.
Spam Prevention:

    Home | About Us | Privacy | Subscribe
    © 2024 Fearnotlaw.com The california lawyer directory

  Copyright © 2024 Result Oriented Marketing, Inc.

attorney
scale