J.M. v. Superior Court CA1/2
Alleged father J.M. (Father) seeks extraordinary relief from the juvenile court’s order setting a hearing under Welfare and Institutions Code section to 366.26, to adopt a permanent plan for A.M. (Minor). Father contends that the San Francisco Human Services Agency (Agency) failed to exercise reasonable diligence in its efforts to locate and provide notice to Father of the dependency proceedings, and that the juvenile court violated Father’s due process rights when it denied Father’s oral motion to continue the six-month review hearing so that Father could explore elevating his paternity status from alleged father to presumed father. Finding no error, we deny Father’s request for an extraordinary writ.
Comments on J.M. v. Superior Court CA1/2