legal news


Register | Forgot Password

Tye v. Papp CA4/2
In an earlier appeal in this case, we affirmed the trial court’s grant of defendants’ special motion to strike, also known as an anti-SLAPP motion. During the appeal, defendants moved for attorney’s fees and costs for prevailing on the anti-SLAPP motion, and the trial court awarded much of the amount requested.
In this appeal, which concerns that fee award, we find that the trial court’s legal analysis as to why the fee motion was timely was erroneous. However, we are unable to resolve a factual issue that will determine whether the motion was timely. Accordingly, we reverse and remand for further proceedings.

Search thread for
Download thread as



Quick Reply

Your Name:
Your Comment:

smiling face wink grin cool nod sticking out tongue raised eyebrow confused shocked shaking head disapproval rolling eyes sad mad

Click an emoji to insert it into your message. You may use BB Codes in your message.
Spam Prevention:

    Home | About Us | Privacy | Subscribe
    © 2025 Fearnotlaw.com The california lawyer directory

  Copyright © 2025 Result Oriented Marketing, Inc.

attorney
scale