legal news


Register | Forgot Password

In re Z.C. CA2/5
Mother and father appeal from the order terminating their parental rights to son under Welfare and Institutions Code section 366.26. Joining in each other’s briefs, the parents contend the juvenile court erred when it declined to find the parent-child beneficial relationship exception to the termination of parental rights applied. They also argue the Los Angeles County Department of Children and Family Services (DCFS) failed to comply with section 224.2, subdivision (b)—the California statute implementing the initial inquiry rules of the Indian Child Welfare Act of 1978 (ICWA) (25 U.S.C. § 1901 et seq.).
We conclude the juvenile court did not err in finding the parent-child beneficial relationship exception inapplicable. We nonetheless conditionally reverse and remand for the juvenile court to order DCFS to comply with section 224.2, subdivision (b).

Search thread for
Download thread as



Quick Reply

Your Name:
Your Comment:

smiling face wink grin cool nod sticking out tongue raised eyebrow confused shocked shaking head disapproval rolling eyes sad mad

Click an emoji to insert it into your message. You may use BB Codes in your message.
Spam Prevention:

    Home | About Us | Privacy | Subscribe
    © 2024 Fearnotlaw.com The california lawyer directory

  Copyright © 2024 Result Oriented Marketing, Inc.

attorney
scale