P. v. Larios CA4/3
Manuel Larios appeals from a judgment after a jury convicted him of sexual offenses. Larios argues the trial court erred in admitting evidence, and the prosecutor committed misconduct. As we explain below, the court erred by admitting a priest’s testimony without determining its probative value and without weighing its probative value, if any, against its prejudicial effect. We reverse the judgment because the court’s error resulted in a miscarriage of justice that denied Larios a fair trial.
Comments on P. v. Larios CA4/3