Marriage of Donohoe & Zaorski CA6
Appellant Martha Donohoe and respondent James Zaorski divorced in 2009. In connection with their divorce, they entered into a marital settlement agreement (MSA), which provided that Zaorski would pay Donohoe an equalizing payment under certain circumstances. In 2016, Zaorski sold his interest in a company he founded. It is undisputed that Zaorski owes Donohoe an equalizing payment based on his “proceeds”—as that term is used in the MSA—from the sale. However, the parties dispute the amount of the payment and whether Zaorski owes postjudgment interest on the equalizing payment.
In orders issued on February 22, 2019 and July 19, 2019, the trial court resolved the parties’ disputes. On appeal from those orders, Donohoe argues that the trial court erred by (1) concluding that a special cash dividend Zaorski received in connection with the sale does not constitute “proceeds” for purposes of calculating the equalizing payment;
Comments on Marriage of Donohoe & Zaorski CA6