P. v. Gregory CA2/2
Will Arthur Gregory (defendant) argues that the trial court erred in denying his petition for resentencing under Penal Code section 1170.95. There was no prejudicial error, so we affirm.
P. v. Gregory CA2/2
Will Arthur Gregory (defendant) argues that the trial court erred in denying his petition for resentencing under Penal Code section 1170.95. There was no prejudicial error, so we affirm.
Copyright © 2024 Result Oriented Marketing, Inc.
Comments on P. v. Gregory CA2/2