P. v. Lockett CA2/8
Defendant Tramel Sylvester Lockett appeals from an order denying his post-sentencing motion to modify restitution, Penal Code section 1202.4, subdivision (f)(1). He contends that intervening events since the restitution amount was originally set show that a reduction in the award is necessary to align it with the victim’s actual losses. We, and the People, agree. We reverse and remand for further proceedings.
Comments on P. v. Lockett CA2/8