In re S.M. CA3
T.M., mother of the minor (mother), appeals from the juvenile court’s jurisdictional and dispositional orders. (Welf. & Inst. Code, §§ 300, 395.) She asserts the juvenile court (1) lacked subject matter jurisdiction under the Uniform Child Custody Jurisdiction and Enforcement Act (UCCJEA), and (2) erred in delegating visitation and in making a finding of reasonable services. We need not address mother’s second contention because the juvenile court did not properly comply with the UCCJEA. We will reverse the juvenile court’s jurisdictional and dispositional orders and remand for further proceedings.
Comments on In re S.M. CA3