In re S.M. CA3
T.M., mother of the minor (mother), appeals from the juvenile court’s order after the six-month review hearing. (Welf. & Inst. Code, §§ 366.21, subd. (e), 395.) As she did in her related appeal from the juvenile court’s jurisdictional and dispositional orders (case No. C093716, of which we hereby take judicial notice), mother asserts the juvenile court lacked subject matter jurisdiction under the Uniform Child Custody Jurisdiction and Enforcement Act (UCCJEA). She further asserts the juvenile court’s finding of reasonable services was not supported by substantial evidence, arguing there was a failure to provide counseling and therapy to the minor to facilitate her relationship with mother, a failure to make a psychotropic medication assessment of mother, and unreasonable delay in the provision of services.
Comments on In re S.M. CA3