In re Ja.M. CA1/3
Casey M. (Father) appeals from jurisdiction and disposition orders in a dependency matter concerning his child, Ja.M. Father argues that the evidence does not support the juvenile court’s jurisdiction order, and that the court failed to state specific facts supporting its removal order as required by Welfare and Institutions Code section 361, subdivision (e). We affirm.
Comments on In re Ja.M. CA1/3