EUREKA CITIZENS FOR RESPONSIBLE GOVERNMENT v. CITY OF EUREKA PART II
Fact that initial draft of EIR was prepared by counsel for applicants did not render it "biased and legally inadequate" where it was reviewed and modified by agency staff, closely scrutinized by independent consultants, and adopted in final form as reflecting the judgment of the agency. Agency's findings on noise impact, aesthetic, and safety issues were entitled to deference and were sufficient where explained in EIR.
Comments on EUREKA CITIZENS FOR RESPONSIBLE GOVERNMENT v. CITY OF EUREKA PART II