legal news


Register | Forgot Password

P. v. Mora CA2/8
Mytchell Mora seeks reversal of a judgment arising from his no contest plea. He contends the trial court improperly deprived him of his attorney of choice at his arraignment. Mora accepted appointed counsel at the arraignment and did not challenge this arrangement until afterwards. We affirm.
Police arrested Mora on December 5, 2018. Mora allegedly had threatened the lives of a police sergeant and the sergeant’s family. A complaint charged him with three counts of stalking and 14 counts of making criminal threats.
Mora’s arraignment was the day after his arrest. It was quick: Mora appeared with a deputy public defender who announced his appearance “for Mr. Mora.” Counsel then waived “formal reading and advisal” and entered a not guilty plea and denials. Mora raised no objection and in fact said nothing. The trial court noted Mora’s probation would remain revoked, set a joint probation violation hearing and preliminary hearing, and concluded the session.

Search thread for
Download thread as



Quick Reply

Your Name:
Your Comment:

smiling face wink grin cool nod sticking out tongue raised eyebrow confused shocked shaking head disapproval rolling eyes sad mad

Click an emoji to insert it into your message. You may use BB Codes in your message.
Spam Prevention:

    Home | About Us | Privacy | Subscribe
    © 2025 Fearnotlaw.com The california lawyer directory

  Copyright © 2025 Result Oriented Marketing, Inc.

attorney
scale