legal news


Register | Forgot Password

P. v. Zepeda CA4/3
Jose Felix Zepeda appeals from the trial court’s postjudgment order denying his Penal Code section 1170.95 petition. He argues the court erred by denying his section 1170.95 petition in his absence without issuing an order to show cause and conducting an evidentiary hearing. The Attorney General asserts the court properly denied the petition because the jury found true a felony-murder special circumstance and Zepeda was therefore ineligible for section 1170.95 relief as a matter of law. This is not the first time we have had to decide whether a jury’s true finding on a felony-murder special circumstance prior to the Supreme Court’s decisions in People v. Banks (2015) 61 Cal.4th 788 (Banks) and People v. Clark (2016) 63 Cal.4th 522 (Clark) rendered a defendant ineligible for relief under section 1170.95 as a matter of law. We concluded it did not in People v. Gonzalez (2021) 65 Cal.App.5th 420 (Gonzalez), review granted August 18, 2021, S269792.

Search thread for
Download thread as



Quick Reply

Your Name:
Your Comment:

smiling face wink grin cool nod sticking out tongue raised eyebrow confused shocked shaking head disapproval rolling eyes sad mad

Click an emoji to insert it into your message. You may use BB Codes in your message.
Spam Prevention:

    Home | About Us | Privacy | Subscribe
    © 2024 Fearnotlaw.com The california lawyer directory

  Copyright © 2024 Result Oriented Marketing, Inc.

attorney
scale