In re Kyle G. CA2/1
In this dependency case (Welf. & Inst. Code, § 300 et seq.), Francesca S. (Mother) challenges the sufficiency of the evidence supporting the juvenile court’s jurisdictional finding under section 300, subdivision (b)(1) that her conduct posed a substantial risk of harm to her 12-year-old son, Kyle G.
While this appeal was pending, the juvenile court terminated dependency jurisdiction and awarded Mother sole physical custody of Kyle, together with shared legal custody and only monitored visitation to the father. As explained below, because Mother has not appealed from the custody order terminating jurisdiction, her appeal is moot.
Although Mother claims otherwise, the record does not support our discretionary review of the limited jurisdictional finding raised on this appeal.
Comments on In re Kyle G. CA2/1