legal news


Register | Forgot Password

In re J.C. CA4/2
J.C. (Father) and F.Y. (Mother) are the parents of seven-year-old Joe.C., a girl born in May 2014, and four-year-old Jos.C., a boy born in August 2017. Father appeals from the juvenile court’s jurisdictional (Welf. & Inst. Code, § 300, subd. (b)) and dispositional (§ 361) orders only as to him. He does not challenge the jurisdictional and dispositional orders as to Mother. Father contends that there was insufficient evidence to support the juvenile court’s finding sustaining the petition against him under section 300, subdivisions (b). He also contends that the juvenile court abused its discretion in ordering random substance abuse testing as part of his case plan. We disagree with Father’s first claim of error, but agree that the court erred in ordering Father to undergo random drug (as opposed to alcohol) testing as part of his family maintenance case plan.

Search thread for
Download thread as



Quick Reply

Your Name:
Your Comment:

smiling face wink grin cool nod sticking out tongue raised eyebrow confused shocked shaking head disapproval rolling eyes sad mad

Click an emoji to insert it into your message. You may use BB Codes in your message.
Spam Prevention:

    Home | About Us | Privacy | Subscribe
    © 2024 Fearnotlaw.com The california lawyer directory

  Copyright © 2024 Result Oriented Marketing, Inc.

attorney
scale