Tiffany H. v. Craig K. CA1/4
Craig K. appeals from orders denying his request for a domestic violence restraining order (DVRO) protecting him from former girlfriend Tiffany H. and instead granting Tiffany’s petition for a DVRO protecting her from Craig. Craig contends the trial court erred when it (1) excluded evidence of events that predated the incident underlying Tiffany’s previous DVRO issued against him after a hearing; (2) failed to enforce his untimely subpoena for police reports; (3) declined to hear testimony from his witnesses; and (4) considered events that occurred while the prior DVRO was in effect. His contentions are meritless, so we affirm.
Comments on Tiffany H. v. Craig K. CA1/4