P. v. Laws CA3
Defendant Harry Darnell Laws appeals from an order denying his petition for resentencing under Penal Code section 1170.95. Defendant argues the trial court erred when it denied his petition without appointing counsel because he made a prima facie showing that his conviction was based on the natural and probable consequences doctrine. In particular, he asserts the court incorrectly engaged in factfinding when it considered the appellate opinion deciding his direct appeal and used the conclusions in that opinion to decide whether he had stated a prima facie case for eligibility under section 1170.95. We affirm.
Comments on P. v. Laws CA3