legal news


Register | Forgot Password

In re King A. CA2/1
Alexus S. (Mother) appeals from the juvenile court’s order terminating her parental rights under Welfare and Institutions Code section 366.26. Mother’s sole contention on appeal is that the Los Angeles County Department of Children and Family Services (DCFS) failed to comply with its duty under state law implementing the Indian Child Welfare Act of 1978 (ICWA; 25 U.S.C. § 1901 et seq.) to inquire of unspecified extended family members whether her child, King, may be an Indian child. (See § 224.2.) We agree with DCFS that any such failure was not prejudicial and, on that basis, affirm the court’s order.

Search thread for
Download thread as



Quick Reply

Your Name:
Your Comment:

smiling face wink grin cool nod sticking out tongue raised eyebrow confused shocked shaking head disapproval rolling eyes sad mad

Click an emoji to insert it into your message. You may use BB Codes in your message.
Spam Prevention:

    Home | About Us | Privacy | Subscribe
    © 2025 Fearnotlaw.com The california lawyer directory

  Copyright © 2025 Result Oriented Marketing, Inc.

attorney
scale