P. v. Allen CA5
Appellant and defendant Clarence Ray Allen was convicted of multiple felony offenses after a jury trial, and the judgment was affirmed on direct appeal. Thereafter, he requested the superior court to strike the restitution fine. The court dismissed and vacated certain fees and assessments but did not strike the restitution fine, and appellant filed this appeal.
On appeal, his appellate counsel has filed a brief that summarizes the facts with citations to the record, raises no issues, and asks this court to independently review the record. (People v. Wende (1979) 25 Cal.3d 436.) We affirm.
Comments on P. v. Allen CA5