legal news


Register | Forgot Password

In re C.R. CA6
In a petition for writ of habeas corpus, petitioner C.R. contended that a regulation promulgated by the California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation (CDCR) that excluded inmates currently serving an indeterminate life term for a violent felony offense from nonviolent offender early parole consideration was contrary to article I, section 32, the constitutional provision mandating early parole consideration that was enacted by voters through their approval of Proposition 57. Petitioner, who is currently convicted of two violent and several nonviolent felony offenses, asserted that under section 32’s plain language, he is entitled to nonviolent offender early parole consideration because he has completed serving the full term for his primary offense.
In an opinion filed July 21, 2021, this court held that CDCR’s regulation was a reasonable interpretation of section 32 and denied the petition.
Petitioner petitioned the California Supreme Court for review.

Search thread for
Download thread as



Quick Reply

Your Name:
Your Comment:

smiling face wink grin cool nod sticking out tongue raised eyebrow confused shocked shaking head disapproval rolling eyes sad mad

Click an emoji to insert it into your message. You may use BB Codes in your message.
Spam Prevention:

    Home | About Us | Privacy | Subscribe
    © 2024 Fearnotlaw.com The california lawyer directory

  Copyright © 2024 Result Oriented Marketing, Inc.

attorney
scale