Duncombe v. Barfresh Food Group, Inc. CA2/2
This litigation arises out of a contractual dispute between plaintiff, cross-defendant and respondent Scott Duncombe (Duncombe) and defendant, cross-complainant and appellant Barfresh Food Group, Inc. (Barfresh). Following a jury trial, judgment was entered in favor of Duncombe and cross-defendant and respondent Givemejust10 PTY Ltd. (G10) (collectively, Duncombe and G10 are referred to as respondents). Duncombe was thereafter awarded attorney fees, and both respondents were awarded costs. Barfresh appeals, arguing: (1) The trial court lacked subject matter jurisdiction over this dispute; (2) The trial court abused its discretion in awarding Duncombe attorney fees; and (3) The trial court erred in awarding respondents their costs.
We affirm.
Comments on Duncombe v. Barfresh Food Group, Inc. CA2/2