legal news


Register | Forgot Password

In re P.C. CA2/2
Following the juvenile court’s denial of a Welfare and Institutions Code section 388 petition concerning her daughter, P.C. (born Sept. 2015), P.S. (mother) filed the instant appeal, arguing that the juvenile court and Los Angeles County Department of Children and Family Services (DCFS) failed to comply with their initial duties of inquiry under the Indian Child Welfare Act (ICWA). It is undisputed that DCFS failed to ask mother’s extended family members, namely P.C.’s maternal grandmother and maternal aunt, about Indian ancestry. The issue before us is whether that failure was prejudicial.
We affirm.

Search thread for
Download thread as



Quick Reply

Your Name:
Your Comment:

smiling face wink grin cool nod sticking out tongue raised eyebrow confused shocked shaking head disapproval rolling eyes sad mad

Click an emoji to insert it into your message. You may use BB Codes in your message.
Spam Prevention:

    Home | About Us | Privacy | Subscribe
    © 2024 Fearnotlaw.com The california lawyer directory

  Copyright © 2024 Result Oriented Marketing, Inc.

attorney
scale