In re B.D. CA3
George W. (father) appeals from the juvenile court’s dispositional orders removing the minor from parental custody and bypassing him for reunification services. (Welf. & Inst. Code, §§ 361, 395.) He contends the juvenile court erred in failing to find him the minor’s presumed father under the principles of Adoption of Kelsey S. (1992) 1 Cal.4th 816 (Kelsey S.) or, alternatively, in failing to provide him with discretionary reunification services. He also contends the Butte County Department of Employment and Social Services (Department) and the juvenile court failed to comply with the inquiry and notice requirements of the Indian Child Welfare Act (ICWA) (25 U.S.C. § 1901 et seq.). We will affirm the juvenile court’s orders.
Comments on In re B.D. CA3