Smith v. Mifflin et al.
This is a legal malpractice action. Plaintiff, appeals from a judgment of dismissal in favor of defendants, and the Law Offices of Mifflin & Associates. The trial court dismissed this case on the date set for trial. The trial court found plaintiff had failed to comply with the expert witness designation requirements of former Code of Civil Procedure section 2034 (now section 2034.010 et seq.). The trial court found plaintiff could not prevail without presenting expert testimony. Court affirm the judgment.
Comments on Smith v. Mifflin et al.