legal news


Register | Forgot Password

In re I.H. CA4/2
G.H. (father) appeals from orders terminating his parental rights to his daughters E.H. and I.H. (collectively children). The mother of the children claimed to have Cherokee, Blackfoot, and/or Sioux ancestry. Pursuant to the Indian Child Welfare Act (25 U.S.C. § 1901 et seq.) (ICWA) and related federal and state law, Children and Family Services (CFS) sent notice of the proceedings to all such tribes; none of them responded that the children were members or eligible to become members.
After that notice was sent, the father and his mother claimed to be descended from Pocahontas. The father now contends that CFS failed to adequately investigate that claim and failed to give notice to any Pocahontas-related tribe.
We will hold that CFS erred by failing to make any ICWA inquiry to the father’s father. However, we will also hold that, based on the inquiries that it did make, CFS had no duty to give notice to any to any Pocahontas-related tribe.

Search thread for
Download thread as



Quick Reply

Your Name:
Your Comment:

smiling face wink grin cool nod sticking out tongue raised eyebrow confused shocked shaking head disapproval rolling eyes sad mad

Click an emoji to insert it into your message. You may use BB Codes in your message.
Spam Prevention:

    Home | About Us | Privacy | Subscribe
    © 2025 Fearnotlaw.com The california lawyer directory

  Copyright © 2025 Result Oriented Marketing, Inc.

attorney
scale