legal news


Register | Forgot Password

In re L.S. CA4/2
Defendant L.S., a minor, appeals from an order of wardship (Welf. & Inst. Code, §§ 602, 725), which was based on a finding that he possessed a firearm at school in violation of subdivisions (b) and (f)(1) of Penal Code section 626.9. L.S., who was 13 years old at the time of the violation, contends that the record does not contain clear and convincing evidence that he understood the wrongfulness of his actions, so the presumption that children under age 14 lack criminal capacity was not rebutted. (Pen. Code, § 26.) We affirm.

Search thread for
Download thread as



Quick Reply

Your Name:
Your Comment:

smiling face wink grin cool nod sticking out tongue raised eyebrow confused shocked shaking head disapproval rolling eyes sad mad

Click an emoji to insert it into your message. You may use BB Codes in your message.
Spam Prevention:

    Home | About Us | Privacy | Subscribe
    © 2025 Fearnotlaw.com The california lawyer directory

  Copyright © 2025 Result Oriented Marketing, Inc.

attorney
scale