legal news


Register | Forgot Password

In re B.C. CA4/1
C.C. (Mother) appeals from the juvenile court’s order denying her Welfare and Institutions Code section 388 petition requesting family maintenance services and return of her daughter, B.C. On appeal, Mother abandons her request for B.C.’s return and argues that the juvenile court erred when it denied her request for an additional six months of services. Mother claims that she established changed circumstances and showed that reunification was in B.C.’s best interests. We conclude that the juvenile court acted within its discretion in denying the section 388 modification petition and affirm the order.

Search thread for
Download thread as



Quick Reply

Your Name:
Your Comment:

smiling face wink grin cool nod sticking out tongue raised eyebrow confused shocked shaking head disapproval rolling eyes sad mad

Click an emoji to insert it into your message. You may use BB Codes in your message.
Spam Prevention:

    Home | About Us | Privacy | Subscribe
    © 2024 Fearnotlaw.com The california lawyer directory

  Copyright © 2024 Result Oriented Marketing, Inc.

attorney
scale