legal news


Register | Forgot Password

P. v. Woods CA6
Defendant Seonjuan Woods appeals from a judgment of conviction entered after he pleaded no contest to violating a protective order pursuant to Penal Code section 166, subdivision (c)(4), and admitted to having a prior strike conviction under the “Three Strikes” law. (§§ 667, subds. (b) (i), 1170.12.) After the trial court denied Woods’ request to strike his prior strike conviction pursuant to People v. Superior Court (Romero) (1996) 13 Cal.4th 497 (Romero), it sentenced him to 32 months in prison.
Woods contends the trial court abused its discretion in denying his Romero request because his background, character and future prospects showed he fell outside the spirit of the Three Strikes law. He also contends he must be allowed to withdraw his no contest plea because it was predicated on the trial court’s indication that it was willing to strike his prior strike conviction.
We reject Woods’ contentions and affirm the judgment.

Search thread for
Download thread as



Quick Reply

Your Name:
Your Comment:

smiling face wink grin cool nod sticking out tongue raised eyebrow confused shocked shaking head disapproval rolling eyes sad mad

Click an emoji to insert it into your message. You may use BB Codes in your message.
Spam Prevention:

    Home | About Us | Privacy | Subscribe
    © 2025 Fearnotlaw.com The california lawyer directory

  Copyright © 2025 Result Oriented Marketing, Inc.

attorney
scale