P. v. Galvan CA4/3
Defendant Ricardo Corona Galvan appeals from the judgment of conviction entered after a jury found him guilty of one count each of attempted carjacking, attempted kidnapping during a carjacking, and assault with a deadly weapon. The jury also found defendant had personally used a firearm in the commission of each offense.
Defendant solely challenges the sufficiency of the evidence supporting the attempted kidnapping during a carjacking conviction. Defendant argues insufficient evidence showed he had a specific intent to kidnap or that he committed any act in furtherance of a kidnapping.
We affirm. For the reasons we explain, defendant’s substantial evidence challenge is without merit.
Comments on P. v. Galvan CA4/3