In re E.E. CA5
Isaac Y. (father) and Esmeralda E. (mother) are the parents of E.E. (born December 2015). Father appeals the juvenile court’s dispositional order denying his request for placement of E.E. pursuant to Welfare and Institutions Code section 361.2, subdivision (a), after the court removed her from mother’s custody. He contends there was insufficient evidence to support the court’s detriment finding, and that the court abused its discretion in ordering him to participate in a domestic violence assessment with recommended treatment, a mental health assessment with recommended treatment, and parenting classes as part of his reunification plan.
We conclude that substantial evidence did not support the court’s detriment finding under section 361.2, subdivision (a), and that the court abused its discretion in ordering father to participate in a domestic violence assessment.
Comments on In re E.E. CA5