legal news


Register | Forgot Password

Christopher U. v. Andrew H. CA4/1
Christopher filed a request for a DVRO against Andrew on May 12, 2021. He lodged documents in connection with his request. Neither the initial petition nor any documents lodged with the court in connection with the petition are in the record before us.
At the hearing, Christopher explained the two had broken up in February, and Andrew had repeatedly emailed him and texted him from numerous fake phone numbers. He told the court that his father’s car passenger window was busted in on February 27, 2021. Two minutes after the window was broken, Christopher received a text message from Andrew that said, “First one was just a tip of the iceberg. Text me back now.”
In Andrew’s submission opposing the request for DVRO, he supplied the court with a declaration and several exhibits. Andrew claimed Christopher had constantly made false claims against him in court, dating back to a conflict in October 2019.

Search thread for
Download thread as



Quick Reply

Your Name:
Your Comment:

smiling face wink grin cool nod sticking out tongue raised eyebrow confused shocked shaking head disapproval rolling eyes sad mad

Click an emoji to insert it into your message. You may use BB Codes in your message.
Spam Prevention:

    Home | About Us | Privacy | Subscribe
    © 2024 Fearnotlaw.com The california lawyer directory

  Copyright © 2024 Result Oriented Marketing, Inc.

attorney
scale