legal news


Register | Forgot Password

P. v. Dinaali CA4/2
A. Prosecution Evidence
1. The Events of July 2014 to September 2014
In July 2014, Michele B. lived in a manufactured home in Phelan with her husband, Mark B., and her teenage daughter. Michele handled all of the family’s finances and paperwork, and she was in the process of obtaining an FHA (Federal Housing Act) loan to refinance the existing loan on the family’s home. The home sat on concrete blocks. On July 2, an appraiser valued the home at $125,000. The appraisal stated that the home met minimum HUD (Housing and Urban Development) standards.
Adrian Q. worked at a mortgage brokerage firm and was helping Michele with her refinancing. The lender was requiring a physical FHA inspection of the property. On July 8, 2014, Adrian Q. obtained a list of FHA inspectors, which included defendant, and he called defendant to perform the property inspection.

Search thread for
Download thread as



Quick Reply

Your Name:
Your Comment:

smiling face wink grin cool nod sticking out tongue raised eyebrow confused shocked shaking head disapproval rolling eyes sad mad

Click an emoji to insert it into your message. You may use BB Codes in your message.
Spam Prevention:

    Home | About Us | Privacy | Subscribe
    © 2024 Fearnotlaw.com The california lawyer directory

  Copyright © 2024 Result Oriented Marketing, Inc.

attorney
scale