PEOPLE v. BELLACOSA
Where defendant's acts of driving while intoxicated and evading peace officers across California Nevada state line constituted continuous course of conduct during which he first violated laws of California and then violated laws of Nevada, physical acts he committed in California were not the same physical acts he committed in Nevada, thus his convictions in Nevada for his conduct in Nevada did not, under Penal Code Sec. 656, preclude his prosecution in California for his conduct in California even though some of the elements of the offenses overlap.
Comments on PEOPLE v. BELLACOSA