legal news


Register | Forgot Password

In re T.L. CA5
On May 14, 2021, the child was taken into protective custody, shortly after his birth, as a result of his parents’ substance abuse and domestic violence problems, and prior history of neglect of the child’s siblings. The agency filed a petition alleging the child was at substantial risk of serious physical harm under section 300, subdivisions (b) and (j). Both parents were interviewed by an agency social worker regarding any potential Indian ancestry on the date the child was placed into protective custody, and both father and W.R (mother), the child’s mother, denied having any Indian ancestry.
At a detention hearing held on May 19, 2021, father was present and appointed counsel while mother did not appear. The report for the detention hearing indicated that the agency inquired about potential relative placement, and it was documented that there were no relatives to consider for placement.

Search thread for
Download thread as



Quick Reply

Your Name:
Your Comment:

smiling face wink grin cool nod sticking out tongue raised eyebrow confused shocked shaking head disapproval rolling eyes sad mad

Click an emoji to insert it into your message. You may use BB Codes in your message.
Spam Prevention:

    Home | About Us | Privacy | Subscribe
    © 2025 Fearnotlaw.com The california lawyer directory

  Copyright © 2025 Result Oriented Marketing, Inc.

attorney
scale