legal news


Register | Forgot Password

In re Cedric I. CA2/4
Appellant Elizabeth I. (mother) asserts that the juvenile court erred in the exit order (Welf. & Inst. Code, § 362.4 ) it issued upon termination of jurisdiction over mother’s teenage son, C. When the juvenile court terminates jurisdiction over a child, it may order counseling or other programs as part of its exit order. However, it may not condition future modification of that order upon the completion of counseling and other programs; such changes are within the province of the family court. (In re Cole Y. (2015) 233 Cal.App.4th 1444, 1456 (Cole Y.).) Mother asserts the juvenile court violated this rule by conditioning any future change in visitation on mother’s completion of drug tests and other programs. Respondent Los Angeles County Department of Children and Family Services (DCFS) disagrees, contending that the juvenile court’s recommendations that mother complete certain programs did not limit the family court’s power to make any future changes to the visitation order.

Search thread for
Download thread as



Quick Reply

Your Name:
Your Comment:

smiling face wink grin cool nod sticking out tongue raised eyebrow confused shocked shaking head disapproval rolling eyes sad mad

Click an emoji to insert it into your message. You may use BB Codes in your message.
Spam Prevention:

    Home | About Us | Privacy | Subscribe
    © 2025 Fearnotlaw.com The california lawyer directory

  Copyright © 2025 Result Oriented Marketing, Inc.

attorney
scale