P. v. Hrenko CA3
Defendant Andrew Thomas Hrenko was sentenced to serve 20 years 6 months in prison for committing four sex offenses against minors. On appeal, he contends: (1) insufficient evidence supports his conviction for annoying or molesting a child because he did not intend to be observed as he masturbated near sleeping children; (2) his sentence was not authorized under a sentencing scheme providing for consecutive full terms for specific sex offenses; and (3) the abstract of judgment inaccurately reflects his convictions. The People disagree with the first contention and concede the latter two. Agreeing with the People, we remand for resentencing and with directions to correct the abstract of judgment, and we otherwise affirm the judgment.
Comments on P. v. Hrenko CA3