legal news


Register | Forgot Password

In re D.O. CA2/4
In September 2021, the juvenile court terminated the parental rights of appellant mother S.W. and non-party father Steven H. over their daughter D.O. (then two years old) at a hearing brought under Welfare and Institutions Code section 366.26. Additionally, despite claims from both Mother and Steven of potential membership in Indian tribes, the court found the Indian Child Welfare Act (ICWA) inapplicable.
On appeal, Mother argues the court erred in declining to apply the parental-benefit exception to terminating her rights and further erred in finding ICWA inapplicable. The Los Angeles County Department of Children and Family Services (DCFS) contends the court did not err in declining to apply the parental-benefit exception but does not oppose a limited remand for compliance with ICWA.

Search thread for
Download thread as



Quick Reply

Your Name:
Your Comment:

smiling face wink grin cool nod sticking out tongue raised eyebrow confused shocked shaking head disapproval rolling eyes sad mad

Click an emoji to insert it into your message. You may use BB Codes in your message.
Spam Prevention:

    Home | About Us | Privacy | Subscribe
    © 2025 Fearnotlaw.com The california lawyer directory

  Copyright © 2025 Result Oriented Marketing, Inc.

attorney
scale