legal news


Register | Forgot Password

In re G.L. CA6
According to the Department’s trial court filings, the maternal grandparents confirmed on July 27, 2020, that they had no Native American ancestry, stating they were from Mexico. E.L. also denied Indian ancestry for herself and stated she did not know about the children’s father’s ancestry during the course of the proceedings. However, at a hearing on October 5, 2021, E.L. stated she believed she had Indian ancestry but had not studied her family’s history and did not know if they had ancestry in a tribe in California. She also stated that she and the children had never lived on a reservation, did not have tribal identification cards, and that the children had never been wards of a tribal court. Neither the court nor the Department investigated Indian ancestry further prior to the selection hearing.

Search thread for
Download thread as



Quick Reply

Your Name:
Your Comment:

smiling face wink grin cool nod sticking out tongue raised eyebrow confused shocked shaking head disapproval rolling eyes sad mad

Click an emoji to insert it into your message. You may use BB Codes in your message.
Spam Prevention:

    Home | About Us | Privacy | Subscribe
    © 2025 Fearnotlaw.com The california lawyer directory

  Copyright © 2025 Result Oriented Marketing, Inc.

attorney
scale