legal news


Register | Forgot Password

In re Courtney P.
Katrina W. is the mother of five daughters (Courtney P., A.P, Angel J., Alexandria W. and A.W.), who were taken into protective custody because of a multi generational family history of sexual assault and molestation and current allegations that their cousin had been sexually molested. Katrina appeals the termination of her parental rights to her three youngest daughters (Angel, Alexandria and A.W.) under Welfare and Institutions Code section 366.26, contending that the juvenile court erred by not applying the beneficial parent-child relationship exception to adoption (S 366.26, subd. (c)(1)(A)) and/or the sibling bond exception to adoption (S 366.26, subd. (c)(1)(E)). The two oldest children (Courtney W. and A.P.) appeal the juvenile court's denial of their section 388 petition, in which they sought to have their three younger sisters placed with them in the home of their maternal aunt, Marla F. Deborah O., a maternal aunt who had been granted de facto parent status, appeals the court's denial of her section 388 petition, in which she sought to have the three youngest children placed with her.
After the court rules on the section 388 petition, the judgments terminating parental rights reinstated.

Search thread for
Download thread as



Quick Reply

Your Name:
Your Comment:

smiling face wink grin cool nod sticking out tongue raised eyebrow confused shocked shaking head disapproval rolling eyes sad mad

Click an emoji to insert it into your message. You may use BB Codes in your message.
Spam Prevention:

    Home | About Us | Privacy | Subscribe
    © 2025 Fearnotlaw.com The california lawyer directory

  Copyright © 2025 Result Oriented Marketing, Inc.

attorney
scale