legal news


Register | Forgot Password

P. v. Madrigal CA5
In 2004, a jury convicted petitioner Alberto Esqueda Madrigal of first degree murder (Pen. Code, § 187, subd. (a), count 1). As to count 1, the jury found true the special circumstance that petitioner committed the murder while engaged in the commission or attempted commission of a robbery (§ 190.2, subd. (a)(17)(A)). The trial court sentenced petitioner on count 1 to a term of life without the possibility of parole, plus one year for a knife enhancement (§ 12022, subd. (b)(1)). (People v. Madrigal (July 27, 2005, F045882 [nonpub. opn.] (Madrigal).)
In 2019, petitioner filed a petition for resentencing on his murder conviction pursuant to section 1170.95. The trial court summarily denied the petition at the prima facie stage without providing a statement of reasons for why it did not issue an order to show cause.
On appeal, petitioner contends the trial court erred by denying his section 1170.95 petition without conducting an evidentiary hearing.

Search thread for
Download thread as



Quick Reply

Your Name:
Your Comment:

smiling face wink grin cool nod sticking out tongue raised eyebrow confused shocked shaking head disapproval rolling eyes sad mad

Click an emoji to insert it into your message. You may use BB Codes in your message.
Spam Prevention:

    Home | About Us | Privacy | Subscribe
    © 2025 Fearnotlaw.com The california lawyer directory

  Copyright © 2025 Result Oriented Marketing, Inc.

attorney
scale