Ramirez v. Pacific Bay Masonry CA1/2
Plaintiff Juan Ramirez and his son Juan Naranjo filed a class action lawsuit alleging various wage-and-hour claims and violations of California’s Unfair Competition Law against their former employer Pacific Bay Masonry, Inc. (Pacific Bay). Pacific Bay moved to compel arbitration pursuant to the arbitration provision contained in the plaintiffs’ employment agreements. The trial court granted the motion as to Naranjo only. In denying the motion as to Ramirez, the trial court found that the arbitration provision contained “minimal” substantive unconscionability, but “significant” procedural unconscionability.
In this appeal, Pacific Bay challenges the denial of its motion to compel arbitration as to Ramirez.
Comments on Ramirez v. Pacific Bay Masonry CA1/2