legal news


Register | Forgot Password

In re K.O. CA1/3
The history of this dependency proceeding is set forth in this court’s prior opinion, which we incorporate here by reference. (Sonoma Cty. Dep’t of Human Servs. v. C.R. (In re K.O.) (May 5, 2020, A158039) [nonpub. opn.].) In that case, this court affirmed a July 2019 dispositional order sustaining Sonoma County Department of Human Services’ (Department’s) allegations that K.O. came within Welfare and Institutions Code section 300 due to Mother’s ongoing substance abuse problem — she tested positive for methamphetamine, benzodiazepine, and opiates throughout her pregnancy. (In re K.O., supra, A158039; § 300, subd. (b) [child has suffered or there is substantial risk the child will suffer serious physical harm or illness resulting from parent’s failure or inability to supervise or protect the child].) The juvenile court further found true allegations that Father had a substance abuse problem, and he knew of Mother’s substance abuse but failed to intervene to protect the

Search thread for
Download thread as



Quick Reply

Your Name:
Your Comment:

smiling face wink grin cool nod sticking out tongue raised eyebrow confused shocked shaking head disapproval rolling eyes sad mad

Click an emoji to insert it into your message. You may use BB Codes in your message.
Spam Prevention:

    Home | About Us | Privacy | Subscribe
    © 2025 Fearnotlaw.com The california lawyer directory

  Copyright © 2025 Result Oriented Marketing, Inc.

attorney
scale