legal news


Register | Forgot Password

P. v. Ford
Defendant has faced two probation violation hearings in this action. In the first hearing, the trial court ruled defendant was not in violation of probation, having resolved credibility issues in defendant's favor. The second probation violation hearing was based on the allegation defendant had committed perjury (Pen. Code, S 118) at the first violation hearing in answering the prosecutor's questions pertaining to two prior arrests. The trial court found defendant had committed perjury at the first hearing and revoked probation. Probation was reinstated on the condition defendant serve 180 days in county jail. Defendant contends in this appeal that there was legally insufficient evidence of perjury to support a probation violation. Court agree and reverse.

Search thread for
Download thread as



Quick Reply

Your Name:
Your Comment:

smiling face wink grin cool nod sticking out tongue raised eyebrow confused shocked shaking head disapproval rolling eyes sad mad

Click an emoji to insert it into your message. You may use BB Codes in your message.
Spam Prevention:

    Home | About Us | Privacy | Subscribe
    © 2024 Fearnotlaw.com The california lawyer directory

  Copyright © 2024 Result Oriented Marketing, Inc.

attorney
scale