Callanan v. Grizzly Designs CA3
Although the Menkens’ motion is directed solely at Callanan’s cross-complaint, there are actually three separate complaints in this case: (1) a complaint filed by Riccardo Marino against the Menkens; (2) a cross-complaint filed by the Menkens against Marino and Callanan; and (3) a cross-complaint filed by Callanan against the Menkens. Marino’s complaint is not at issue here, and he is not a party to this appeal. We thus summarize only the Menkens’ cross-complaint against Callanan and Callanan’s cross-complaint against the Menkens.
The Menkens’ Cross-complaint
As noted, the Menkens filed a cross-complaint against Marino and Callanan. According to the allegations in the Menkens’ cross-complaint, the relevant facts are as follows.
The Menkens are “engaged in the research and development of various cannabis based products intended for marketing in the burgeoning cannabis market space.”
Comments on Callanan v. Grizzly Designs CA3