legal news


Register | Forgot Password

In re A.E. CA2/1
We will limit the presentation of facts to those pertinent to the only disputed issue on appeal: Whether the failure of the Department of Children and Family Services (DCFS) to make inquiries under ICWA requires reversal.
In a prior dependency case in 2014, mother and father both submitted a signed ICWA 020 form in which they indicated they had no American Indian ancestry. The juvenile court found there was no reason to suspect A.E. was an Indian child as defined by ICWA, and therefore found the child did not fall within the provisions of ICWA. The court ordered the parents to keep the department, their attorney and the court aware of any new information relating to possible ICWA status.
On September 4, 2019, a tow-truck driver called in a referral to DCFS alleging mother was intoxicated in a vehicle with A.E. seated inside.

Search thread for
Download thread as



Quick Reply

Your Name:
Your Comment:

smiling face wink grin cool nod sticking out tongue raised eyebrow confused shocked shaking head disapproval rolling eyes sad mad

Click an emoji to insert it into your message. You may use BB Codes in your message.
Spam Prevention:

    Home | About Us | Privacy | Subscribe
    © 2025 Fearnotlaw.com The california lawyer directory

  Copyright © 2025 Result Oriented Marketing, Inc.

attorney
scale