legal news


Register | Forgot Password

P. v. Frazier CA3
We take the facts from our prior decision. (People v. Frazier (Feb. 23, 2021, C082028) [nonpub. opn.] (Frazier).)
Defendant killed his heroin supplier. A postal carrier saw defendant, armed with a revolver, arguing with another person. The other person walked away and defendant followed. After the two men went between some buildings, the postal carrier heard gunshots and then saw defendant walk out. (Frazier, supra, C088702.) The victim was shot six times at close range, including once in the back. (Frazier, supra, C088702.)
Defendant later told a friend he killed someone. (Frazier, supra, C088702.)
Defendant lived at his parents’ home. His father discovered a revolver he kept at the house was missing. That gun was never found. (Frazier, supra,C088702.)
In a videotaped interview with the police played for the jury, defendant claimed acquaintances must have stolen his father’s gun.

Search thread for
Download thread as



Quick Reply

Your Name:
Your Comment:

smiling face wink grin cool nod sticking out tongue raised eyebrow confused shocked shaking head disapproval rolling eyes sad mad

Click an emoji to insert it into your message. You may use BB Codes in your message.
Spam Prevention:

    Home | About Us | Privacy | Subscribe
    © 2025 Fearnotlaw.com The california lawyer directory

  Copyright © 2025 Result Oriented Marketing, Inc.

attorney
scale