legal news


Register | Forgot Password

P. v. Dorn
Defendant pleaded guilty to the charge of possession for sale of a controlled substance (Health and Saf. Code, S 11351) after the denial of his motion to suppress evidence (Pen. Code, S 1538.5). Dorn appeals the judgment, contending the motion to suppress was incorrectly denied because the evidence was illegally obtained in a warrantless search. (Pen. Code, S 1538.5, subd. (m).) He argues the (1) detention, (2) patdown search, and (3) arrest and subsequent search were unreasonable under the Fourth Amendment to the United States Constitution. Court affirm.

Search thread for
Download thread as



Quick Reply

Your Name:
Your Comment:

smiling face wink grin cool nod sticking out tongue raised eyebrow confused shocked shaking head disapproval rolling eyes sad mad

Click an emoji to insert it into your message. You may use BB Codes in your message.
Spam Prevention:

    Home | About Us | Privacy | Subscribe
    © 2025 Fearnotlaw.com The california lawyer directory

  Copyright © 2025 Result Oriented Marketing, Inc.

attorney
scale