legal news


Register | Forgot Password

In re C.J. CA1/3
C.J. (Father), father of minor C.J., appeals from orders denying his petition under Welfare and Institutions Code section 388 and terminating his parental rights under 366.26. Father’s sole contention on appeal is that the Contra Costa County Children and Family Services Bureau (Bureau) failed to comply with its duty under the Indian Child Welfare Act (25 U.S.C., § 1901 et seq.; ICWA) and related California law (§ 224 et seq.) to conduct an initial inquiry into whether C.J. was an Indian child.
C.J. was the subject of an April 2021 dependency petition alleging he was at risk of serious physical harm due to the chronic substance abuse of his mother, T.H. (Mother). (§ 300, subd. (b)(1).) Mother indicated in her ICWA-020 form that she had no Indian ancestry. Father did not complete an ICWA-020 form and indicated that he did not know if he had Indian ancestry.

Search thread for
Download thread as



Quick Reply

Your Name:
Your Comment:

smiling face wink grin cool nod sticking out tongue raised eyebrow confused shocked shaking head disapproval rolling eyes sad mad

Click an emoji to insert it into your message. You may use BB Codes in your message.
Spam Prevention:

    Home | About Us | Privacy | Subscribe
    © 2025 Fearnotlaw.com The california lawyer directory

  Copyright © 2025 Result Oriented Marketing, Inc.

attorney
scale